Jake & Surma discuss the latest developments in JavaScript with Mathias Bynens & Sathya Gunasekaran.
Subscribe to the channel! → http://bit.ly/ChromeDevs1
Watch more HTTP203 → http://bit.ly/2sPq2LB
Listen to the HTTP203 podcast for more content! →
https://developers.google.com/web/shows/http203/podcast/
Itunes → https://apple.co/2IQagG6
Original source
31 responses to “What’s new in JavaScript – HTTP203”
Mathias is crazy hyped!!! 😛
How would a minified js look like if semi-colon is removed?
Message to whoever is writing the subtitles for these videos: At 03:38, it should be "class declarations", not "classic iterations".
gibs me da ::bind, I don't care about the pipeline operator, ramda is a much better solution for composing functions.
lol you refer to your manager like their a wife or something
Why do people still care about Javascript? We have WebAssembly now, no?
With WebAssembly, you can write for the web with any language.
That comment from Mathias about re-implementing "+" with "-" is both brilliant and terrifying… cause they are actually capable of doing it when they want to start the apocalypse
These guys are very smart. Einstein told me once that fantasy is more important than knowledge.
When will NodeJS run modules asynchronous instead of synchronous. Now I have to write extra code to accomplish this.
Holy shit fourteen nights Surma no wonder you're at Google
This was enjoyable, thanks.
What is the plus thingy Jake mentioned? Something like +'1' === 1?
So cool, Mathias always look like he knows every detail XDD
Private vars are bad in this environment, I think a developer should be able to fiddle around with internal stuff. The underscore shows them it's not meant to be used already
00:05 Sathya laughing laughing laughing
That's a great upcoming feature – private prop 🙂
Tamizhan da!! 🙂
Private fields?? Wow
It's nice to hear that that you guys don't like semi-colons either….. lets get rid of them and swap ASI with ASR, automatic semi-colon removal!
Http 203 ?
Kazunori Sato lol
private – yuck
Why would any browser vendor other than Microsoft ever support VBScript?
Not even worth joking about it. 😛
Privates props in classes… I will start to cry of joy
LOL ReDim -ing arrays
What is a good name for that "not global" module scope that was mentioned at 3:40. I understand the idea, its scoped to the module/file and not on the window/global, but what do we call that scope? "Not-global" doesnt seem very clear
itd be a great april 1st joke if google announced that chrome will support vbscript and is working together with microsoft to achieve this in the next months xd
Hard to follow this
No love for pipeline operator? 🙁
I SECOND that you're first
first